← All Dossiers
Hyperstition – Pre-Round
In Conversation Round: Pre-Round  ·  Fund: StoryHouse Fund II
Dossier generated 2026-07-09 by /deal-dossier  ·  Deal record: recQJt42HBIavMvXo  ·  Source: Airtable appjxAR3LPe3fkHOp

One-Liner & Thesis

Hyperstition Research is a $4.1M/hard-cap-$5M pre-seed deep-tech fund led by Dmitri Skjorshammer (Harvey Mudd) and Kirsten (10 years at SpaceX on Falcon 9 and Starlink), pairing an AI research platform that tracks 2,000+ companies and 6,000+ individuals with a "Kardashev acceleration" thesis across robotics, manufacturing, space, energy, and compute. GPs have contributed $1.5M of their own capital, no management fee, 20% carry. Fund I is a validation vehicle for three claims: (1) does the AI research system generate real edge, (2) can they access deals that matter at $50–200K check sizes, and (3) can they deliver on operator-value promises. Portfolio to date includes SH-overlap names (Ultra Robotics, Sancho, Arnie) plus Hellbender, General Robotics, Oryn AI, Araknode, Dispatcher (Web).

Miles's read after two working calls: the strategic-integration story (shared diligence, AI platform access, HMC + SpaceX talent pipeline) is genuinely interesting, but there is no evidence yet that Dima sources HMC founders better than SH's existing infrastructure, and his investment judgment on calls has been "cerebral but unfocused" without deep customer or reference diligence. SH context: if we invest, the recommended size is $50–200K purely as ecosystem/partnership capital — Josh Jones's 1% pattern — not a conviction return-driver. A $200K+ commitment starts to compete with meaningful pre-seed ownership in a direct deal.

Investment Score & Recommendation

59/ 100
HOLD

Biggest driver: SpaceX + HMC network access plus an AI research platform we could plug into shared diligence — both plausibly asymmetric assets. Biggest drag: SH's own read that Dima's investment judgment is unproven, HMC sourcing edge is unclear, and most of Fund I's Claremont exposure was introduced by us.

Momentum: Accelerating Red flags: 3 / 9 Confidence: Medium
Market & TAM8/10
25% weight
Team & Founder6/10
25% weight
Product & Traction5/10
20% weight
Deal Terms4/10
20% weight
VC Syndicate6/10
10% weight

Deal Box

Funding Round
Pre-Round (Fund I LP close targeted end of July 2026)
Vehicle
StoryHouse Fund II
Deal Terms
NA (fund-of-funds; no mgmt fee, 20% carry) (Internal)
Fund I Raised
$4.1M (hard cap $5M) (Internal)
GP Commit
$1.5M of own capital (Internal)
Co-Investors
HMCINQ, Individuals (Nvidia / Shield AI / aerospace)
Indicative SH Check
$50–200K (relationship-driven) (Internal)

Company Snapshot

Vehicle Type
Emerging-manager pre-seed / seed fund (Fund I)
Thesis
"Kardashev acceleration": robotics, manufacturing, space, energy, compute
Website
hyperstitionresearch.com
Location
Seattle (GP based)
Structure
0% mgmt fee · 20% carry · AngelList admin · Chris Harvey counsel (Internal)
Target Portfolio
40–50 companies (Internal)
Avg Check
$100K ($50K–$200K), ~$30M avg post-money (Internal)
Deployed
~$1.6M across 13 investments (~30%) (Internal)

Market Size

$18.8B
Robotics/Physical AI VCWeb
Raised YTD 2026
$27.6B
2025 Physical AI VCWeb
vs. $13.8B in 2024
$38B
Global Robotics MktWeb
+34% YoY 2026
~20%
Claremont Deep-Tech SliceInternal
Of exit value (~80% is LS + enterprise)

Hyperstition sits in the fastest-appreciating VC sub-sector of 2026 (Web). Their broader "Kardashev" framing — robotics feedback loops into space, energy, and compute — overlaps the exact 20% Claremont deep-tech slice SH has said we want more systematic exposure to (Internal). Timing is genuine; the question is not the market, it is whether Hyperstition specifically wins in it.

Competition

PlayerPositioningFunding / StageEdge vs. them
HyperstitionOperator-GPs, AI research platform, SpaceX + HMC networkFund I $4.1M, ~30% deployed
Veredas PartnersPhysical-AI first-check, HMC-adjacent operator GPsFund II $15M target (Internal)Direct HMC-network peer; Hyperstition adds SpaceX and a codified AI diligence platform
1517 FundDeep-tech pre-seed / Thiel-fellow adjacentFund V $80M+ (Web)1517 has scale and brand; Hyperstition wins on technical intimacy, SpaceX-community access
Yohei Nakajima's fundAI-native diligence-driven micro-VC (CMC)~$10M Fund I (per Internal note)Directly analogous alt-comparison Miles named; Yohei is arguably closer to SH thesis
Framework VenturesCrypto-to-robotics crossover (led Ultra term sheet)Institutional multi-fund (Internal)Framework leads rounds; Hyperstition writes first-checks earlier and smaller

Moat: The genuine differentiators are (1) Kirsten's Falcon-9/Starlink credibility unlocking SpaceX-alumni deal flow and (2) the internal AI research platform, both of which are hard to replicate; the SH concern is that neither has yet produced a HMC-sourced founder we would not otherwise have seen.

Traction

13
Fund I InvestmentsInternal
$1.7M allocated
2,000+
Companies TrackedInternal
6,000+ individuals
~23%
Deals From AI PlatformInternal
3 of 13 investments
10
LPs SignedInternal
$25K min, $500K max
3
SH-Overlap PortfolioInternal
Ultra, Sancho, Arnie
Q1'26
Ultra Term Sheet AssistInternal
Framework Ventures via Dima intro

Exit Potential

LP DPI
Return Path
Fund-of-fund economics
8–12 yr
Time to LiquidityWeb
Emerging-manager norm
1.3–2.5x
TVPI RangeWeb
Emerging-manager median band
Ecosystem
Primary RationaleInternal
Not conviction-driven return

Return economics are LP-driven, not acquirer-driven. A $4.1M Fund I is small enough that a single deep-tech breakout — well within reach given a 2026 M&A cycle featuring Nvidia–Groq $20B, Mobileye–Mentee $900M, and Skild AI's acquisition of Zebra's robotics business (Web) — can materially move the fund. But Miles has explicitly framed a potential SH check as ecosystem/partnership capital, not return-conviction: the harder-to-answer question is whether an LP commitment adds materially to what a strong quarterly relationship, AI-platform access, and a co-diligence agreement would already deliver.

Founders

Dmitri "Dima" Skjorshammer
Founder & GP, Hyperstition Research
Harvey Mudd alumnus; background spans fintech, crypto, AI, and early-stage product development. Also founder of Hayek Capital / Baseline Markets (on-chain market-making in crypto), which he continues to operate. Built Hyperstition's AI research platform to address the sourcing/diligence bottleneck he encountered as an investor. Contrarian early call on vertical robotics applications before consensus shifted; introduced Framework Ventures to Ultra ahead of their term sheet.
Kirsten
Co-founder, Hyperstition Research · ex-SpaceX (2011–~2021)
Spent roughly a decade at SpaceX, leading portions of Falcon 9 and Starlink development. Named in notes as a lead-scientist-caliber technical operator; anchors Hyperstition's SpaceX-alumni network access (the emerging "PayPal mafia of deep tech," per Dima). Referenced in older notes as lead scientist at Samsara in the industrial perception/vision space, prior to Hyperstition.

Open Questions & Risks

Next Steps

Latest Meeting Notes

2026-06-17 IC memo Miles's internal case against a conviction check

Miles's post-diligence write-up. Position: not particularly excited; prefers to allocate to direct pre-seed conviction. If we invest, keep it small ($50–100K) as relationship-driven, not conviction-driven.

Source: Meeting Notes recQVTpcwLzXQCZL5
2026-06-16 Team discussion Case FOR a small ecosystem check

Miles's separate note weighing an ecosystem-building rationale for a ~$200K check — not to return capital, but to underwrite diligence partnership, AI-platform access, and possibly formalize Dima as SH's Deep Tech Venture Partner.

Source: Meeting Notes recwS3XawkKqaZEI9
2026-05-15 Email update Dima Q1 report + final close push

Dima's Q1 2026 LP update forwarded internally. Fund is at $3.75M soft commits, moving to end-of-May close; 7 new investments in Q1 (13 total, $1.7M allocated); thesis expanded from robotics to full "Kardashev acceleration."

Source: Meeting Notes recaTHZAPxitU6Aby

Deal Timeline

Reference Calls

One earlier note (2026-05-15) is tagged with Dmitri himself as a Referenced Founder, reflecting an internal forward of his own Q1 update rather than a third-party reference call. No external reference conversations have been logged for this deal.